Gartner describes infrastructure as code (IaC) as a key way to unlock the potential of the cloud. Nevertheless, some corporations encounter challenges in IaC adoption, particularly in relation to sustaining a safe posture. As adopters automate their infrastructure deployments, they typically encounter safety points related to misconfigurations, code vulnerabilities, configuration shifts, secret administration, and entry management.
Two of the main instruments utilized in IaC are Ansible and Terraform. They each have noteworthy safety features, and every has its personal safety points that DevOps groups want to concentrate to, however is yet another safe than the opposite?
Let’s consider these infrastructure automation instruments from a cybersecurity perspective, to realize insights into which may be the higher match in your group.
Ansible and Terraform Overview
Earlier than going into an in depth safety comparison of Ansible and Terraform, right here’s a fast rundown of their key options. The 2 have similarities, however additionally they provide distinct capabilities with overlapping functions in infrastructure automation.
Ansible is an open-source automation answer designed to simplify many complicated IT duties concerned in infrastructure administration, together with provisioning, configuration, the deployment of purposes, orchestration, in addition to compliance enforcement.
The market chief, Terraform was likewise open supply till the summer season of 2023, when it switched to a extremely restrictive enterprise license mannequin. With IBM’s acquisition of Terraform’s mother or father firm Hashicorp in 2024, there was much speculation within the tech group relating to the way forward for the product, particularly because the lion’s share of its developer ecosystem has moved on to OpenTofu.
Terraform is notable for being based mostly on “declarative” language, which describes the meant state of the infrastructure, versus Ansible, which works on an “crucial” foundation, whereby the code signifies steps or instructions.
With each instruments’ help for multi-cloud and on-premises environments, Ansible and Terraform are extremely appropriate for DevOps workflows. There are main variations of their safety fashions, although.
Ansible Safety Professionals and Cons
One of many strongest safety features of Ansible is its agentless structure, considerably minimizing the potential assault floor. Brokers might be exploited to reveal hardcoded credentials, benefit from misconfigurations, and stage provide chain assaults by means of compromised modules, plugins, and templates.
Moreover, Ansible comes with normal safety capabilities, notably the encryption of secrets and techniques and entry controls. The Ansible Vault encrypts passwords, API keys, and different delicate information. Ansible has a role-based entry management (RBAC) system that’s baked into the Ansible Automation Platform, particularly the Ansible Tower.
It additionally gives pre-built safety compliance playbacks that confirm the enforcement of safety insurance policies. Nevertheless, Ansible nonetheless leaves the chance open for safety vulnerabilities within the following areas: the usage of unencrypted credentials in playbooks, reliance on SSH for distant execution, and the danger of privilege escalation.
When configured incorrectly, Ansible Vault has been recognized to reveal credentials in plain textual content throughout execution, which may expose delicate information in YAML information. In the meantime, misconfigurations in Sudo privileges could make for privilege escalation dangers, permitting unauthorized customers to execute privileged instructions.
Terraform Safety Professionals and Cons
Terraform addresses a number of the safety challenges in Ansible. Specifically, its mixture of immutable infrastructure and declarative language makes configuration inconsistency and drift much less seemingly. This immutability allows reproducibility, which suggests the constant enforcement of safety insurance policies and simpler validation of safety configurations.
In relation to secret administration, Terraform integrates natively with Hashicorp Vault, however it might additionally work with AWS Secrets and techniques Supervisor and different safety options. It could handle secrets and techniques by way of “suppliers.” This implies flexibility in managing delicate information.
Terraform enforces the precept of least privilege with its Identification and Entry Administration (IAM) insurance policies. It’s designed to solely present the permission required to undertake a particular operation.
Furthermore, Terraform now helps encryption for state information, a vital part in infrastructure administration. This file incorporates the small print of the present state of a managed infrastructure, serving as a hyperlink between the infrastructure configuration and real-world sources. The issue with state file encryption, nonetheless, is that it’s not automated. If the state file is uncovered with out encryption, delicate information resembling API keys and credentials might be compromised.
Additionally it is value noting that, not like Ansible, Terraform lacks a local RBAC system. Its enforcement of entry management is thru exterior cloud supplier insurance policies. Moreover, managing dependencies might be fairly complicated with Terraform. It’s essential to correctly outline dependencies to keep away from insecure configurations in addition to the unintended deletion of sources.
Which Platform Is Extra Safe?
Each Ansible and Terraform provide robust safety capabilities, however they’ve their respective limitations. Customers can overcome these limitations by mastering correct configuration and implementing safety finest practices. There isn’t any particular reply as to which infrastructure automation instrument is healthier from a safety perspective.
Ansible is mostly extra appropriate for safe configuration administration in current programs, in addition to for compliance enforcement, due to its agentless execution and sturdy native RBAC. It’s a sensible choice for dealing with legacy infrastructure administration.
In the meantime, Terraform has some key benefits for safe infrastructure provisioning due to its declarative language and immutability. It excels at provisioning new infrastructure constructed from scratch. Terraform is nice at creating equivalent predictable environments, which makes it the popular selection for individuals who repetitively arrange improvement, testing, and manufacturing environments.
This isn’t to say that Ansible can’t be a very good instrument for situations the place Terraform is deemed preferable and vice versa. They each provide a level of flexibility, making them legitimate infrastructure automation options for numerous use instances. Ansible’s automation capabilities transcend configuration administration, whereas Terraform’s modular design allows code reuse and scalable infrastructure configurations.
Can Ansible and Terraform Be Used Collectively?
It isn’t essential to solely select one between Ansible and Terraform – they will truly be used collectively in fashionable infrastructure administration. Terraform handles the provisioning of the underlying infrastructure, whereas Ansible configures the working system and the set up and deployment of purposes.
For instance, your crew would possibly use Terraform to provision a set of EC2 cases on AWS, whereas preferring Ansible for the set up and configuration of an online server in the identical set of EC2 cases.
Ansible and Terraform could be a nice duo for infrastructure automation, as they complement one another’s strengths. They are often nice instruments for accelerating cloud-based improvement processes. Nevertheless, if the purpose is just to stop configuration drift, Terraform alone is already sufficient. In the identical vein, if the primary concern is steady compliance and software program deployment, Ansible alone suffices.
In Conclusion
Ansible and Terraform are wonderful instruments for safe infrastructure automation. They can be utilized individually or collectively to maximise the advantages. Utilizing each of them might not be cost-efficient, although. In deciding which one to make use of, it is very important fastidiously study the operational objectives and your DevOps crew’s safety workflows.
Picture by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay